<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stamp Duty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obriend.info/2007/05/03/stamp-duty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obriend.info/2007/05/03/stamp-duty/</link>
	<description>Daragh O Brien on Information Quality Management &#38; other issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daragh</title>
		<link>http://obriend.info/2007/05/03/stamp-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-6570</link>
		<dc:creator>Daragh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 10:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obriend.info/2007/05/03/stamp-duty/#comment-6570</guid>
		<description>Looks like SF agree with George Lee... http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/?jp=MHAUSNAUAUCW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like SF agree with George Lee&#8230; <a href="http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/?jp=MHAUSNAUAUCW" rel="nofollow">http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/?jp=MHAUSNAUAUCW</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fianna Fail to Reform Stamp Duty at Irish Election</title>
		<link>http://obriend.info/2007/05/03/stamp-duty/comment-page-1/#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>Fianna Fail to Reform Stamp Duty at Irish Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 08:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obriend.info/2007/05/03/stamp-duty/#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>[...] there is the obvious concern that we are using one stamp duty issue to distract from another. Surely unfounded?   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is the obvious concern that we are using one stamp duty issue to distract from another. Surely unfounded?   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
